data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/023fd/023fd47148af3faccab534056f10beb48fb0dccf" alt=""
When you write and put your thoughts in the bazaar of ideas for all to see, it is inevitable that someone disagrees with you. It's how it works, and that's actually how it should work: show me someone who's always right and I will show you the True Messiah. We haven't had one of those around here for quite a number of centuries, last time I checked anyway.
So this evening, after watching Jim Furyk win the Chevron post-season tournament, I find this criticism of a column I wrote back in April in my Facebook inbox. I had to read it twice, to be sure I was seeing what I thought I was reading. I found it fairly hilarious, given the immaturity of its scatological reference. If that's mature debate, I'm Abraham Lincoln.
Apparently, Mr. Galloway didn't like my taking him to task for his thesis in his Huffington-Post column that because Tiger Woods displays his temper from time to time on the golf course he is "bad" for children. I think that argument is bunk, and so do a number of parents of junior golfers. The column even quotes one who said "I do not believe Mr. Woods or any other golfer is responsible for [my son's] behavior." She then added that she and her husband are the ones who give their children proper guidelines, surely signs of good, responsible parenting.
Now he wants me to believe that because Woods doesn't know how to behave in his marriage that his argument that Woods' behavior on the golf course is bad for children is somehow now correct. Using his own words, he was right and because I think his estimation of Woods on-course behavior is wrong, well, you can read the rest. Straw man argument atop straw man argument, that.
Um, ok, whatever. Thanks for taking the time to write. Your April column is still bunk, even if Tiger Woods is a cad.
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!
Mr. Galloway deigned send me, a mere "nobody" (to use his own words) another message on Facebook today:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22ac2/22ac26d581b676368a742803dc59a16402d5b4e0" alt=""
It can't look good for Huffington Post, and I am quite surprised that Galloway's editors would allow this to go on. Actually, I don't think they know about it. Perhaps it is time to make that happen.
Bravo Charles! Bravo!
ReplyDeleteIt amazes me how upset Mr. Galloway was with Tiger's mouth, yet his comment to you on Twitter was downright vulgar IMHO.
ReplyDeleteIt's amusing that he would go out of his way to reach out to you both directly. Shows a pretty thin skin.
ReplyDeleteI could understand his re-posting of the article (which he initially removed because he got so much heat over it...again, shows a weak backbone to take a post down just because people don't like it) to say 'hey I think this proves I was right' but to reach out like this is pertty laughable.
Thank God he hasn't caught my act yet. He'll be speechless, without speech and have no speech...
ReplyDeleteLooks like another example of a free-nintey-nine HuffPo blogger who somehow doesn't quite get it.
ReplyDeleteWow,
ReplyDeleteRon is back over at Real Women Golf acting very unprofessional.
I've added another missive from Mr. Galloway to the bottom of the entry.
ReplyDelete